The Closest Language to English

Introduction

The question of which language is most closely related to English has long attracted attention among linguists, historians, and the general public. English belongs to the West Germanic branch of the Indo-European language family, alongside German, Dutch, Low German (Low Saxon), and Frisian. Within this branch, English has developed unique features due to heavy contact with Old Norse during the Viking Age and extensive borrowing from French and Latin after the Norman Conquest. Despite these external influences, English retains a core Germanic structure, and scholars have debated whether Frisian, Scots, should be regarded as its closest relative. Yola is also a close language which is not often mentioned albeit extinct.

---

Frisian

Classification and Relationship

Frisian, spoken today in parts of the Netherlands (Friesland) and Germany (North Frisian and Saterland Frisian), is the only surviving member of the Anglo-Frisian group along with English. Old English and Old Frisian shared a number of sound changes and lexical innovations that distinguished them from Old Saxon and Old High German.

Lexical and Grammatical Similarities

• Lexicon: Basic vocabulary often parallels English:

  • Frisian tsiis (“cheese”) vs. English cheese (German Käse shows a different form).

  • Frisian hûn (“dog”) vs. English hound.

  • Frisian ik bin (“I am”) vs. English I am (German ich bin uses a different root in the 1st person singular).

• Phonology: Shared Anglo-Frisian sound shifts, such as the palatalization of certain consonants and the fronting of back vowels.

• Grammar: Both languages reduced case inflection relatively early compared to German.

Differences

Modern Frisian, especially West Frisian, has been heavily influenced by Dutch in vocabulary and syntax. Mutual intelligibility with modern English is limited, despite the shared ancestry.

---

Scots

Classification and Status

Scots is a Germanic language closely related to English, spoken in Lowland Scotland and parts of Ulster. While sometimes described as a dialect of English, many scholars and speakers classify it as a distinct language, with its own literary tradition dating back to the Middle Ages. Scots and English developed from a common ancestor: northern varieties of Middle English.

Lexical and Grammatical Similarities

• Lexicon: Scots shares the majority of its vocabulary with English, though often in distinct phonological forms:

  • Scots bairn (“child”), English child (cf. Old English cild).

  • Scots ken (“know”), English know (cf. Old English cennan).

• Grammar: Like English, Scots has lost grammatical gender and case endings. Word order is largely identical.

Differences

• Phonology: Scots retains certain vowel qualities absent in Standard English.

• Vocabulary: Scots preserves many words no longer common in English (e.g., greet = “cry,” wee = “small”).

• Standardisation: English has a globally dominant standard, whereas Scots exists in a spectrum from broad dialects to varieties closer to Standard English (“Scottish Standard English”).

Because Scots and English separated only in the late medieval period, they remain mutually intelligible to varying degrees, especially for speakers familiar with each other’s accents and vocabulary.

---

Yola (Ireland)

Historical Background

Yola was an archaic form of English once spoken in County Wexford, Ireland, until it became extinct in the 19th century. It descended from Middle English introduced by settlers during the Anglo-Norman period (12th century) and preserved many features lost in mainstream English. Alongside Forth and Fingallian (other extinct varieties), Yola is part of the Anglo-Irish Middle English tradition.

Lexical and Grammatical Features

• Lexicon: Yola retained words and pronunciations closer to Middle English than to Modern English.

  • Yola zuck (“such”), compare Modern English such, Old English swylc.

  • Yola naart (“night”), compare Modern English night, Old English neaht.

• Pronunciation: Conservatively retained many Middle English vowel sounds.

• Grammar: Archaic verb endings (I yeve = “I give”), older pronoun forms (ich = “I”), and double negation were common.

Differences

By the 18th century Yola was unintelligible to speakers of Standard English without special study. It died out as communities shifted to Irish English.

A Yola language song.

---

Comparative Assessment

• Frisian: Genealogically the closest living language to English, sharing deep historical sound changes and lexical roots. However, centuries of divergence and Dutch/German influence mean that mutual intelligibility today is low.

• Scots: Historically the closest modern variety to English, sharing the most grammar and vocabulary, and often mutually intelligible. Its closeness is due to its later separation from English, not deep genealogical unity.

• Yola: A conservative offshoot of Middle English that preserved features lost in Modern English, making it a “living fossil” of English development until its extinction. It was not genealogically closer than Scots or Frisian, but it provides crucial insights into older stages of English.

---

Conclusion

The question “What is the closest language to English?” does not have a single answer, but depends on the criteria applied:

• Historical/genetic closeness: Frisian is the nearest relative within the Germanic family.

• Practical similarity and mutual intelligibility: Scots is closest among living varieties.

• Archaic survival: Yola, though extinct, represented an unusually conservative form of English.

Together, these languages highlight different aspects of English’s complex history, from its Anglo-Frisian roots to its Middle English offshoots and regional relatives.

Comparative Table: English and its Close Relatives

---

Observations

• Frisian: Shows very close cognates (ik bin ~ I am, bern ~ bairn). Grammar resembles early English but vocabulary is influenced by Dutch.

• Scots: Shares nearly all grammar with English but has its own vocabulary and sound system (bairn, guid, ken). Often mutually intelligible with English.

• Yola: Preserves archaic forms (ich for “I,” thee bist for “you are”), plus spellings that look older. It sounded much more like Middle English.

• Modern English: Streamlined, heavily influenced by French/Latin, but still recognizably Germanic in its grammar and core vocabulary.

Numbers 1–10

---

Colors

---

Common Verbs

---

Observations

• Numbers: Strong cognates across all four, with Yola showing spellings and pronunciations closer to Middle English (e.g., vour for four, vive for five).

• Colors: Almost identical across the board, though Scots often has distinctive phonetic forms (reid, yellae).

• Verbs: Striking similarity across all, especially core verbs (to be, to have, to go). Scots and Frisian preserve forms (gae, gean) that echo older Germanic roots, while Yola retains archaisms (beon, luf).

 

Proverb Comparison

---

Observations

• Frisian and English: Near-identical syntax and vocabulary, showing the Anglo-Frisian connection.

• Scots: Still fully comprehensible to English speakers, though spelling reflects a distinct sound system.

• Yola: Looks like an “older” English — conserves medieval forms (mæk, hondhs), which would have sounded archaic even in the 18th century.

 

Comparative Proverbs

1. “The early bird catches the worm.”

---

2. “Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.”

---

3. “A rolling stone gathers no moss.”

---

Observations

• Frisian: Strikingly close to English, differing mainly in spelling and phonetics.

• Scots: Often mutually intelligible, but distinct vocabulary and phonology (stane, nae, afore).

• Yola: Conserves archaic features that feel like “fossilized English,” with medieval vocabulary and verb endings (gadrath).

• Modern English: Standardized, familiar forms.