Shakespeare’s epic play, Macbeth is one of his greatest works and in the eyes of some his greatest. The play deals with the very powerful theme of the struggle between good and evil, and also the complex nature of good and evil and how they can interplay with one another and that man far from being a simple creature is a complex one within whom both good and evil reside.
Macbeth as a Good Man - Act 1, Scene 2
Macbeth is first portrayed in the play as a good man.
The first reference to him in the play is when a Captain tells the king and his court news of the battle of Macbeth’s courage in a recent battle.
‘For brave Macbeth—well he deserves that name—’
This is important to ponder upon here. Because Macbeth is called ‘brave’. Bravery is closely connected to with being open as opposed to secretive. A warrior goes out openly in the battlefield, proclaims his allegiance to his side and fights. This is in contrast to later on in the play rather than ‘openess’ we see duplicity and deceit from Macbeth. He murders the king in secret and tries to pass the blame on to the guards. If we were to look at the ying and yang of good and evil, of light and darkness then good is connected to light here and evil to darkness.
Macbeth’s open bravery in battlefield contrasts that with his secret murder of the king. The battle is in the day, the murder of the king is in the night, a time of darkness. We also see later on in the play Hecate meet the witches during the night. Openness, honesty, bravery, good are all connected to light and deceit, cowardice, evil are all connected to the night and to darkness. Both good and evil exist in the world, both light and darkness, both day and night. How the these two pairs interplay with each other is the challenge that man faces.
Also the phrase, ‘he deserves that name’ is something we need to look at.
Does Macbeth deserve the name ‘brave’? Well the Captain certainly thinks so and the king reacts accordingly by bestowing upon Macbeth the title of the new Thane of Cawdor. However can we say Macbeth is brave? We can say that he was on that particular day, and that part of him is brave. However as we see later on there is a part of him which is cowardly including in his inability to resist the taunts of cowardice hurled against him by his arguably mentally stronger wife. We also see his cowardice and insecurity when he fears the threat of Macduff and even orders the murder of a woman and her child i.e. Lady Macduff and her children.
‘Not all that glitters is gold’, and deception and image versus reality is also another theme of Macbeth. Truth and illusion, image and reality are another duality that exist in this play.
Also the Captain makes mention of the word ‘name’. Well, this is important in the play because Macbeth is given the ‘name’ or title of Thane of Cawdor as foretold by the witches who also told him that he would gain another title (name), that of king. The play is essentially about that. What man will do for a title, for status, for name and the consequences that may have.
The Captain continues and says of Macbeth
‘Like valor’s minion carved out his passage’
Valor’s minion here in a more contemporary form of English would mean ‘the servant of courage’ or something akin to that. Again the points we made above about Macbeth apply. Is he really a courageous man? Yes he is, but only in part and there exists within him cowardice, fear and insecurity which emerge later on. He is not a simple wholly good character but like most people, complex and composed of both good and bad. However unfortunately for ‘brave Macbeth’ (as the captain calls him) it is the evil inside him which overpowers him and causes his tragic and bloody demise.
Thus we are introduced to Macbeth as a brave man.
Before looking at that scene let us look at the scene before, the first in the play.
Act 1, Scene 1
This scene has been discussed previously when talking of the theme of the supernatural in this article, click here.
However to look at it again we see the witches utter the words:
‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair
Hover through the fog and filthy air.’
This in modern language would be akin to saying ‘Good is evil, and evil is good’. There is a confusion here, a tension.
It can also lead to asking the question, what is ‘foul’ (good) and what is ‘fair’ (evil)? For some what is good can be considered evil and vice versa, what is evil can be considered good. Is Macbeth himself good or evil? Well in the previous scene we see that he was. A brave and loyal man.
‘Good’ and ‘evil’ are labels at times, or ‘names’. Names like how in the following scene we see that the Captain say ‘brave Macbeth—well he deserves that name—’. That was the Captain’s opinion, that Macbeth deserved that name. Was it correct? Well partially not completely. That was his perception, and perceptions emanate from our experiences and information which can be limited or faulty.
If the Captain Macbeth were to in the future order the murder of children those words may have never sprung from his lips. So when the witches say ‘Foul is fair, and fair is foul’. This can apply to Macbeth, he is good but he is also evil, he is evil but also good. He is a loyal and brave warrior but also a murderer of children.
This is the nature of man, both good and evil reside within him and at times depending on the external factors he is exposed to one of those two (good and evil) may come to the fore, may be more dominant than the other.
It is the witches who seek to cause the evil in Macbeth to emerge and to cause destruction, malicious and wicked creatures that they are.
In the scene after Macbeth’s bravery is described it is then that we seem him encounter the witches. We then see the genesis of his fall.
Act 1, Scene 3.
This scene has also been discussed before and to read it click here.
To quote from that earlier article.
‘Macbeth, a relatively simple man susceptible to psychological manipulation as we shall see later, has as his first words in the entire play,
‘So foul and fair a day I have not seen.’
These words are ironic, ‘foul’ meaning bad and ‘fair’ meaning good, because on that day he receives recognition for his valiant feats as a warrior by hearing that he will be Thane of Cawdor, which is something good, but he also hears prophesies which poison him and set him on a path of continuous bloodshed spiralling more and more until the destruction of his wife and ultimately himself.
This existence of two opposing sides, this duality is representative of the play on a deeper level. Because just as one day can have both good and evil, so can one man. Macbeth has both good in him, a brave and loyal soldier, however he has within him a latent evil which if aroused or manipulated can lead to great suffering and that evil is the one of greed for power as well as his weakness in being unable to withstand the taunts of his wife who bids him to murder Duncan, the king.
However whilst Macbeth has both good and bad in him, Shakespeare squarely puts the witches as forces of evil.’
One of the most interesting things in this scene and very important to note is the sheer irony of Angus’ words to Macbeth. Angus and Ross come to the heath to deliver a message from the king himself to Macbeth. Ross informs him that he is Thane of Cawdor to which Macbeth replies ‘The thane of Cawdor lives‘ that there is already a Thane of Cawdor.
Angus then says:
‘Who was the thane lives yet, But under heavy judgment bears that life Which he deserves to lose. Whether he was combined With those of Norway, or did line the rebel With hidden help and vantage, or that with both He labored in his country’s wrack, I know not; But treasons capital, confessed and proved, Have overthrown him.‘
What is ironic hear is that Angus says of the old Thane of Cawdor deserves to die, to ‘lose’ his life. What then of the man who he is saying these words to who will murder the king cowardly and treacherously whilst Duncan (the king) was asleep, in contrast to the previous Thane of Cawdor who at least openly fought like a warrior.
‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair‘ as the witches say. Good is evil and evil is good.
Who is worse, the former Thane of Cawdor or the new one?
Once again we see two contrasts. A contrast between an open foe (the first Thane of Cawdor) and a supposed friend, Macbeth, who murders the king. Open rebellion versus hidden treachery. Angus and Ross praise Macbeth as the Captain did, but ironically if they were to know of his future crimes they would not do so.
All through out the play we see contrasting pairs, contrasting dualities. Good versus evil. Openness versus duplicity and a little later we see another example when Macbeth says to himself about the prophecies of the witches, one of which has already come true, his getting the title of Thane of Cawdor.
‘This supernatural soliciting Cannot be ill, cannot be good. If ill, Why hath it given me earnest of success, Commencing in a truth? I am thane of Cawdor.’
Macbeth is now in a state of conflict and confusion. Torn between the two opposing forces of morality and immorality.
The witches prophecies ‘supernatural soliciting’ cannot be bad or ‘ill’ not can they be good. He is not sure of what to make them as regards whether they – the predictions – are good or bad. If they were bad then why have they turned out to be true in terms of him becoming Thane of Cawdor, but he continues:
‘If good, why do I yield to that suggestion Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair And make my seated heart knock at my ribs, Against the use of nature? Present fears Are less than horrible imaginings. My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical, Shakes so my single state of man That function is smothered in surmise, And nothing is but what is not
He says if it is good then why does he have the ‘horrid’ image of ‘murder’. This thought ‘shakes’ him to his core.
However the witches did not tell him that he would need to murder Duncan to become king. That thought comes from him. A more intelligent man would have thought that perhaps the future would unravel in such a way that Duncan might die a natural death and his son might not wish to be king and that ultimately Macbeth might become the monarch. Rather, in contrast, Macbeth does not think of any of this, nor does he think deeply but instead almost instantaneously enamoured with the prospect of becoming king, the idea of murdering Duncan comes to him.
This brave warrior who killed for the king may now kill the king.
This once valiant soldier whose violence was supposedly for noble causes, may now be for wicked causes.
However who is to decide what violence is good and what violence is bad? Macbeth has killed already.
The Thane of Cawdor will be killed, which we can be sure of will be due to the orders of Duncan.
Duncan will kill the Thane of Cawdor, and be killed by the new Thane of Cawdor.
If it is alright for Duncan to kill the previous Thane of Cawdor, why is it wrong for the new Thane of Cawdor to kill him?
Who determines right and wrong and morality?
As the witches say ‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair’
Macbeth is torn. There is an internal conflict between the forces of good and evil inside him. He is as mentioned before in a previous article, akin to a tree swaying or shaking from side to side. There is turbulence inside him just like the turbulence of the weather that day. There is also good inside him. The good that horrifies him at the idea of murdering Duncan.
However late Macbeth does admit that he may not have to be actively involved in trying to gain the crown. He says:
‘If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me Without my stir.’
If fate wants him to be king he may not need to do anything, to ‘stir’ means to move, to act.
However rather than accept that what will be will be and if the crown of Scotland is meant for him it will be so, Macbeth’s greed has been ignited by the prophesies. We can already see that he has thoughts of murdering the king, an act at that time wrong on many different counts.
– Murder outside of war is generally wrong.
– Murder of a relative, Duncan was Macbeth’s cousin.
– Murder of the king who people believed was chosen by God to rule over them.
The opening of Macbeth is very powerful because we are shaken. We do not know what is what. Good is evil, evil is good. The witches are of this world or are they not? Are they dead or are they alive? Are they men or are they women? Should Macbeth kill or not kill Duncan? Are the prophecies of the witches good or bad? Macbeth himself is shaken.
Macbeth then says the famous words:
‘And nothing is but what is not.’
which in other words means that what seems to be is actually not. What seems to exist ‘is’, does not exist, ‘is not’.
These words are very deep and ironic. Macbeth’s loyalty to the king is actually not real, for it shall be him who is the one who kills him. The ‘glory’ of becoming king brings little but misery and an ignominious death for him at the hands of Macduff. What seems to be is, is not as it seems.
This is indeed part of the power of the play, the strong contrasts and the deep irony.
Act 1, Scene 4
In the following scene Duncan says of the old Thane of Cawdor:
‘There’s no art To find the mind’s construction in the face. He was a gentleman on whom I built An absolute trust.‘
He says there is no way to know a man’s mind by looking at his face. What may appear good may be bad inside. ‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair’ as the witches said. Macbeth is replete with irony and this is yet again another example, as Duncan’s next words after speaking of the old Thane of Cawdor’s betrayal then says to his cousin, Macbeth:
‘O worthiest cousin, The sin of my ingratitude even now Was heavy on me. Thou art so far before That swiftest wing of recompense is slow To overtake thee. ‘
This condemning of the old Thane of Cawdor who Duncan will kill and praise of the new Thane of Cawdor by whom he will be killed, shows us once again just how much things may not be as they seem.
This goes back to the two lines of the play:
‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair‘ and‘ And nothing is but what is not.’
Good is evil, evil is good. What is, is not. Is a ‘good’ and ‘evil’? Is an ‘evil a ‘good’? Is Macbeth the brave soldier who fought for the king really good?
Is it really good for the king to make him Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth himself asked if the witches prophecies were good or bad, and if good why does he think evil thoughts of murder.
The world is a foggy and unclear place, not all is what it seems to be.
Macbeth himself is a confused person, torn between conflicting feelings.
Later on in this scene we see this internal conflict more clearly when he says:
‘The prince of Cumberland! That is a step On which I must fall down, or else o’erleap, For in my way it lies.
Duncan’s son has become the heir to the throne who is always given the title ‘Prince of Cumberland’. Macbeth says essentially that Malcolm is an obstacle on his way to becoming king which must leap over. This shows Macbeth’s ambition and his constant coveting of the crown. It is this greed, this lust for being king which fuels his acts.
Macbeth then says:
Stars, hide your fires;
Let not light see my black and deep desires.
The eye wink at the hand, yet let that be
Which the eye fears, when it is done, to see.’
Macbeth’s desires are ‘black and deep’, they are shameful that he would wish for them to be hidden, for light not to be cast upon them. These desires are so evil that he wishes his eyes themselves do not see ‘wink’ what his hand does.
Once again Shakespeare is very skilful at showing the tension within Macbeth which is representative of the conflict between good and evil in the wider world, with contrasting pairs. ‘Light’ versus ‘black’ i.e. light and darkness. Seeing and not seeing. Being apparent and being hidden.
Macbeth talks of ‘light’ not seeing his ‘black’ desires which is light versus darkness. His eyes which see should not see (wink) his acts, and he talks of how the ‘eye fear’ what there could be to ‘see’.
He wants to do, but not to see.
He wants the end outcomes of these actions, but is deep inside ashamed of these actions.
He wants the rewards but not the required acts.
He is wrought with tension, with contradictions.
In the next article we will continue to look at the theme of good and evil in Macbeth including lady Macbeth and her influence on her husband.
Useful vocabulary for students.
- Duplicity – Meaning dishonest but originating from the same roots as the words ‘dual’ or ‘duo’ which mean two, duplicity means being two-faced. Macbeth is full of respect to the king in front of him but is thinking of killing him.
- Valor – Bravery, courage.
- Enamoured – to love something or to be deeply interested or fond it. Macbeth is enamoured with the idea of being the new king.
- Covet – To desire something, often things which one should not desire or has a degree of jealousy. Macbeth covets the position of being king.
- Deceit – Lying and dishonesty.
- Demise – Fall or decline, or a person’s death. Macbeth’s demise can be said to be ultimately caused by the witches prophecies igniting some of the evil inside eventually resulting in his death.
- Ying and Yang – originating from Chinese philosophy, the concept of two different contrasting energies. In the context of Macbeth we can see it in the form of a struggle between good and evil.
About English Made Simple
English Made Simple is a website dedicated GCSE English, IELTS Preparation and other things providing useful content to readers all across the world on how to improve their English